Is our congress occupied by national traitors?

new occupy congress

Is our congress occupied by national traitors?

Question
Our Congress wasn’t shy about expressing their unwavering loyal allegiance to a foreign leader and a foreign nations interests, effectively slapping our President across the face along with the interests of the American people.

This is odd because Obama’s speech which everyone went into a rabid rage over, was traitorous in itself. His unwavering allegiance to a foreign nation didn’t go unnoticed by me, neither did his expressing that America’s security could be sacrificed for the sake of Israel’s security go unnoticed by me.

I noticed that the “Americanpatriotnetwork” is also ironically a network full of national traitors, who are in fact patriots for a foreign nation while parading themselves as if they are patriots for their own nation.

I think my country may be suffering from a brain-disease that makes them not understand what national patriots or national traitors actually are. A brain-disease that makes them irrationally allegianced to a FOREIGN NATION.
No, not “allied”, I meant exactly what I said: “Allegiance.”

When Foreign leader Netanyahu has more command over our congress and the brain-diseased among our population than our own President does, “allied” is no longer an appropriate term, it’s “allegiance.”

And a google news search for “Obama Israel” should yield you many results. It’s not like I’m referring to anything obscure.

Answered by Arch Duke Smokey III
I think the word you were looking for was allied. A brain disease that makes them irrationally allied to a foreign nation. Of course this isn’t even a complete or rational sentence. Whatever. Got any sources? I don’t think anybody knows what you’re referring to.
Answered by Mr Miyagi wants a kiss
You are the company you keep.
Answered by Thalia
Its curous to see a tiny little country of 7m act as the puppet-master of America.

I can’t imagine a similar sized nation like Denmark ever carrying the same weight. Or even Australia which is three times larger.

Answered by peace m
You are quite right, the vast majority of the congress reps are traitors. It was disgusting, they gave Nwtanyahu 29 standing ovations on a speech that made a mockery of International Law regarding Palestine which they have stolen. I don’t know what hold the Israeli hasbara and “fifth column” have over US reps that lets them get away with loathsome policies in support of Israel’s criminal government. Why does US government give at least 3 $ billion of US taxpayers money to Israel every year, why does US veto every UN resolution that rightly condemns Israeli atrocities? Why does a super power allows itself to become mocked and humiliated by AIPAC and other Israeli groups to the point that it gives priority to serving Israeli interests? Why did US covered up Israeli false flag operation on USS Liberty in which over 30 American of the ship’s crew were murdered by Israeli bombing? If these are not acts of treason what is? Why is it that one of the former Israeli PMs could openly say that they don’t worry about US because US does what Israel wants. Why is it that despite being such a small portion of the population many of the strategic US Admin positions are occupied by Israel firsters? There’s a lot that doesn’t make sense that should be questioned.

hot occupy congress

Do you understand Republics by design never will offer Democracy directly for the people?

Question
Republics are run by regimes or in USA representative govt! In USA the well connected elite Capitalist bribe anyone who occupies a position in representative govt. They create laws of fleece under Capitalism and secure wealth for themselves “ONLY”.

Congress provides Socialism to the elites “corporate welfare” while the citizen masses face “Capitalism”. i.e. the private Federal reserve has been given enough money by Congressional authorization to keep propping up the failing system.

Answered by American Citizen
I understand Amerikkka is a violent, racist, hypocritical, exploitive, war mongering, corporate oligarchy built on the twin pillars of the preservation and promotion of white privilege and white power.
Answered by ΩikΩσ
True democracy is only possible with small groups, perhaps up to the level f a small township. It becomes unwieldy when you get to a population in the myriads and impossible in the hundreds of thousands. The population of the USA is in the hundreds of millions. The republical form of government, with checks and balances added, is the best we can do.
Answered by How Would I Know
Did you know that there are free dictionaries online? And that you can browse there and read the definition of Democracy and learn that a Republic is a form of it?

You really need to do better than this to convince us to embrave the poverty and oppression of your worker’s revolution.

Answered by Ron Raygun
It is what it is.

latest occupy congress

Pelosi: Why Didn’t Republicans Object to the Tea Party?

Question
Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is wondering why republicans haven’t spoken out against tea party protests as she continues to support the Occupy Wall Street movement.

House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi says she agrees with protesters from Wall Street to Washington who are saying most of the country isn’t getting a fair shake from the financial and political establishments.

Republicans are criticizing the protesters’ message as divisive. Asked to respond, the California Democrat said on ABC’s “This Week” that the GOP didn’t object to the tea party’s in-your-face protests against members of Congress in last year’s elections.

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor this week said he was concerned about the “growing mobs” and criticized those who support them. He said condoning the demonstrations amounted to supporting the “pitting of Americans against Americans.”

It is obvious Pelosi still doesn’t understand the tea party movement and possible she doesn’t understand the Occupy Wall Street movement either. The tea party is full of everyday people who believe the federal government is out of control in its size and with its spending. Economic data, including a 9.1 percent unemployment rate, a failed $ 800 billion stimulus and $ 15 trillion in U.S. debt back up their concerns. Occupy Wall Street on the other hand, is a mob of clueless, unsanitary young adults demanding more free stuff and as Derek Hunter points out in his column today, many are paid and union led, which would make Pelosi’s previous statement calling tea partiers “astroturf” applicable to the movement she now supports.

Katie Pavlich the News Editor at Townhall.com

Answered by Elizabeth
they are all rolling in money in 1 bed. Didn’t you get that?
Answered by Tony R
The only thing I can say is the OWS crowd has made their demands, but have not given a way that those can be met. Mostly they talk about how they want what the rich have, so I would conclude that jobs are not paying enough, that is their complaint. I have not even heard the current administration give a plan as to how those demands can be met. Jobs paying more is the only answer to that problem, but how are you going to get businesses to pay more for jobs they offer. Obama talks about taxing the rich, but that does not make businesses pay more for jobs offered. So the OWS protests about a problem but that is all they are doing.

The only solution is pass laws for a maximum wage so the rich can’t make to much, then make businesses pay more for lower paid jobs, or tax businesses and rich and give that money to people that make little money on the job, but when asked if the government should do this, most OWS will say no the government should not do that. So what do we do then?

The current administration talks like they support the OWS, yet are not really doing anything to meet their demands. Why, because the administration knows the solutions to their demands would not fly with the American citizen and be death for them in future elections. So the OWS gets screwed as far as their demands.

my conclusion. Pelosi says she supports the OWS, and may convince herself she does, but in reality does not.

Answered by Yuuuup
It is obvious Pelosi still doesn’t understand the tea party movement

Do you see any problem here Students face deportation to countries they don’t remember?

Question
Their secret was out: Despite their upbringing in middle America, their academic success and their network of native-born friends, they had no permission to be in the United States. Their parents had brought them here illegally as children.

The Robles brothers, now out of jail but fighting removal in Immigration Court, are among thousands of young illegal immigrants in similar situations, living at risk of being expelled to countries they barely remember.

Two weeks ago, a Harvard University student who came from Mexico at age 4, Eric Balderas, joined their ranks after he was arrested by immigration agents at the San Antonio Airport.

They are known in some circles as “Dream Act” kids, named after proposed legislation that would grant them legal status.

Their cases underscore a contradiction in the Obama administration’s approach to immigration enforcement. Even though the president supports the Dream Act — which would provide a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants brought here as children who enroll either in college or the military — his enforcement bureaucracy continues to pursue deportation cases against the increasing number of students who would be protected by it. It’s part of a push that is on track to remove a record 400,000 illegal immigrants this year.

“It highlights the inconsistencies in immigration policies,” said William Perez, a Claremont Graduate University professor and author of “We Are Americans,” a book about undocumented immigrant students.

Immigration authorities say they rarely deport students, particularly once their teachers, coaches, friends and elected representatives speak out on their behalf.

Balderas, for example, was placed in “deferred status,” meaning the government won’t remove him unless he gets in trouble. But even so, the young people remain in legal limbo, often unable to land a professional job after earning a degree. And they live with a legal sword of Damocles over their heads, subject to removal at any moment.

“These cases illustrate the need for comprehensive immigration reform,” said Virginia Kice, spokeswoman for Immigration and Customs Enforcement. “ICE uses its discretion on a case-by-case basis, as appropriate.”

Carlos and Rafael Robles were on the way to visit a friend at Harvard — not Balderas — when they were arrested. They spent a weekend in jail before friends posted $ 5,000 bond for each of them. They had to travel to Buffalo again recently for a court hearing after an immigration judge turned down their request to move the case to Chicago. Their next court date is next year.

Their father works for a car dealer, and their mother is an assistant at a mortgage company. They came to the U.S. by airplane five years ago on a tourist visa and never went back.

“We want to go to school and to work here,” Carlos Robles said.

Several residents of their community, a Republican-leaning Chicago suburb where most people have little patience for illegal immigration, have written letters on their behalf, said Robert Carroll, a teacher at Palatine High School.

“Gee whiz, these are just two quality kids,” he said. “They are everything you would want your kids to be. These kids are going to be leaders in their communities — taxpayers, not tax recipients.”

In recent months, immigration rights activists have renewed their push to convince Congress to pass the Dream Act. Activists have staged hunger strikes and occupied congressional offices. Earlier this month, about 30 students marched outside the Los Angeles office of Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.). Feinstein is a co-sponsor of the Dream Act, but activists criticize Democrats for not moving the bill this year.

“Immigration reform may be dead this year, but we feel that smaller pieces like … the Dream Act can move forward,” said Marisol Ramos, founding board member of the national United We Dream network. “Democrats should really step up.”

The Dream Act, sponsored by Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) and others, came up eight votes short in the Senate in 2007, when an effort to overhaul immigration law fell apart. The following year, then-candidate Barack Obama urged its passage during a presidential debate, saying that youths who “have essentially grown up as Americans” deserve legal status. But Obama has done little to push the bill as president.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-deport-student-20100628-1,0,218526.story

Answered by chuck steak
Well their students, it shows they are educated and actually care about this country unlike the rest of those pigs. So i vote the students should stay and deserve legal status. As long as they speak English as well i have no problem with them.
Answered by Daria { Ad Astra Per Aspera }
I think it’s admirable they have excelled in their studies. However, it is not our job to help finance their education. I don’t give a rat’s booty if they don’t remember their home country. They are not Americans. They should go home and begin their citizenship process. I don’t see a problem with students being deported. I am sure they have family there so…..
Answered by BH6
Wait. These kids are illegal aliens. I don’t see the issue here. Illegal aliens are illegal. Illegal aliens are criminals. Criminals go to jail or get sent home.
Answered by PoBoy
No, absolutely not. The Dream Act is an abomination that rewards criminal behavior. There are colleges in Mexico. If you are a Mexican citizen I suggest you attend one.

Related Links

You might also like


isnt it amazing how gabby giffords, despite being disabled was able to show up?
isnt it amazing how gabby giffords, despite being disabled was able to show up? and cast vote on...

Why didn’t George W. Bush go to Arlington Cemetery on Memorial Day the first 2 years he was President?
Why didn't George W. Bush go to Arlington Cemetery on Memorial Day the first 2 years he was President? I...

Why is Obama insulted ????/ Rudy speech?
Why is Obama insulted ????/ Rudy speech? I was a community organizer...I am not insulted ..it's...

Comments

  1. davethenayber says:

    Send them back with their parents.

    Illegal activity should not be rewarded.

  2. nonof y says:

    All countries have immigration laws people are to follow to enter and remain in a country. The parents are the ones to blame for bringing children from their own country illegally into another country. Sooner or later, illegal aliens are discovered and sent back to their own country. Too bad it took so long to discover these illegals, but they will learn about their own country just like they had to learn about the country their parents snuck them into. Probably won’t take long to adjust once they are back home among their relatives.

  3. lah lah lah says:

    The Dream Act does nothing but encourage illegal aliens to commit more crimes against our citizens. Out out out- send them back after they have all personal belongings confiscated and auctioned off to help with our debt.

  4. Joel W says:

    I sure do. There seem to be a lot of students in our academic centers who have been here way, way to long. The Schools need to be required to check the status of those students, and NOT permit the illegal aliens.

    That may offend them… if it does, simply with hold the tax money that supports them. I hope that is clear.

    To the illegal aliens in that spot the liberal talked about. One thing you should do while you are stealing an education from the United States and its people, is find out about your own country because if it can be arranged, you will need it.

Speak Your Mind